अमर उजाला

My Perspective: Futile Use of Political Power: Vijay Sanghvi

My Perspective: Futile Use of Political Power: Vijay Sanghvi Sages have said for ages that political power and morality cannot walk together. Similarly history tells from its experience that economy and morality cannot coexist. Systems collapse only with entry of dishonesty in corruption of either. The Prime Minister Narendra Modi seems to be flexing his political muscle to cause an impression of using political power to introduce morality in economy. It is inculcating character in child with a cane. With drastic step of demonetisation in November 2016, his entire attention has been focused on the campaign to eliminate use of black money in business world without touching the corrupt elements within the administration. Futility of his approach has driven the second known Indian economist settled in America to run away from him. The chief Economic Adviser, Arvind Subramaniam to the Modi government resigned last week. Earlier Raghuram Rajan preferred to go away rather than contribute his abilities to moving the economy forward. Both were apparently exasperated by his dictums and came to conclusion that he had no use of their expertise. The Prime Minister focused his efforts to eliminate menace of black money from the Indian system with demonetisation. Does he really want or can be really end the menace without corrective reforms in political arena? From where can political parties get funds for expenditures in elections that they cannot put down in their account books without inviting risks of disqualifications? To circumvent the election law on ceiling of expenditure by candidates on election and thus eliminate risk of revocation of election, the Prime Minister Indira Gandhi amended the election law to exxclude the party expenditure from expenditure by the candidate though both expenses are essentially by the party. In last few elections expenditures in each constituency have run over several crore rupees, far beyond the prescribed ceilings. Limits cannot be enhanced without causing disenchantment in masses about the election system. If the party and candidates mobilise only accounted money as resources, then they have to put every kind of expenditure that they cannot. Given the needs, at least in thinking of parties and candidates for kind of expenditures needs, full scale purification is not possible. It would mean the ruling party can and will continue to use unaccounted resources but opponents cannot as they will be barred by law. Morality in politics cannot be introduced in such truncated form. It is not equality but partiality though money does not ensure victory in any election. Political leaders in general and in power in particular suffer from false sense of their ability to influence voters through money power, muscle pressure or caste consideration though it has been proved in every landslide mandate to be mirage. Factors that constitute voters’ political minds are beyond comprehension of political entities. NaMo ought to know it. He fought state elections in 2002, 2007 and 2012 as well as the Lok Sabha polls in 2014. A hired plane was attending to his needs for 46 days during the intense and stormy campaign for the Lok Sabha polls. Hire charge for each hour was Rs 4.50 lakh for the plane. It amounted to be Rs.1.08 Crore a day. He addressed 108 meetings and each cost heavily for arrangements so that he can be seen and heard by everyone in the audience. Even his campaigns in the state assembly polls cost the party, if the party paid for, heavily. In addition the extensive usage of social media to catch young could not have been possible without heavy costs. The format of his fight against corruption or for instilling morality in politics and economic world leaves enough scope to suspect his intents. Fight against corruption cannot and will not succeed if goose is killed and gander is allowed to escape unhurt. Without attributing the authority, it was claimed that two and half lakh licenses to industrial and business units were cancelled by the government on suspicions of corruption involved obtaining them. But it was not followed up with information as to how many officials involved in granting those licenses were punished or even questioned. Corruption cannot be one ended business. There have to be takers of undue advantages as givers in cash or kind. It leaves an uncanny feeling that fight against corruption is one ended for punishing business class and that happens to have overwhelming numbers as traditional supporters of the Bharatiya Janata Party. No leader would indulge in harassing his party’s traditional vote banks. Political compulsions obviously forced him to adopt economic stances adverse to interests of the middle class. International image of Indian wealthy was already sullied. The sustained campaign over the black money by the Prime Minister further confirmed that they are dishonest and tax evades. No people were condemned by their own elected Prime Minister as they were in India. Political science student would easily see a threat in the stance to indicate he was ready with alternatives o overcome any hindrance to his seeking the second term. He will not be seeking approval but forcing the decision. His advantage is in reading by others that no alternate merged inside our outside the ruling campus to challenge him. His selective campaign against corruption clearly indicates that it was not to end corruption but equip the self with a political bludgeon to beat opponents. He has a strong reason to be weary of big wigs in his camp who forced him to abandon his original plans of establishing as the shining star of Indian youth with rapid economic transformation of India. He will force not only his selection for the second term but also usurp authority to select candidates of his choice to gain a personal majority in the next parliamentary party. He would not like anymore to make his survival in office to dictates of forces outside his band. He paid price for allowing the centre of power to go out of his hands in the current terms He may be product of democratic process but he has no pretense to be democratic by nature He firmly believes in sole personal rule. It alone can deliver results. That is his motto. He proved it by reducing stature and political power of his colleagues in the Cabinet and the party soon after he took over.

दैनिक ट्रिब्यून में

सुबह-सवेरे में

सन्मार्ग में

सन्मार्ग में

सोज का गिरगिटिया रंग

1994 में भारतीय जनसंचार संस्थान से डिप्लोमा मिलने के बावजूद हिंदी विभाग के छात्रों से नौकरियां दूर ही रहीं..इक्का-दुक्का लोगों को छोड़ दें तो मेरे जैसे प्रवासी लोग फ्रीलांसिंग कर रहे थे..उन दिनों हम जैसे फ्रीलांसरों को दैनिक हिंदुस्तान के तत्कालीन सहायक संपादक कृष्णकिशोर पांडेय बहुत सहयोग देते थे.. आज पत्रकारिता में एक खास धारा के लोगों के लिए लालू यादव मसीहा हैं..लेकिन ढाई दशक पहले बिहार में जिस तरह शासन चल रहा था, उससे मीडिया के बड़े धड़े की नजर में लालू की छवि सिर्फ हंसोड़ राजनेता की थी.. उस माहौल में कृष्णकिशोर पांडेय पहले सहायक संपादक थे, जिन्होंने अपने संपादकीय में लालू के लिए लालू जी शब्द का इस्तेमाल किया.. उन दिनों उनके दफ्तर में कई राजनेता भी आते थे, अपना लेख देने और छपवाने.. दैनिक हिंदुस्तान की पहली मंजिल पर स्थित उनके काठ के केबिन में ही चरण सिंह सरकार में विदेश मंत्री रहे श्यामनंदन मिश्र, रूसी विद्वान पी ए बारान्निकोव, नंदकिशोऱ त्रिखा, सैफुद्दीन सोज से मुझे मुलाकात का मौका मिला..वही सैफुद्दीन सोज, जो कश्मीर पर दिए अपने बयान को लेकर विवाद खड़ा कर चुके हैं.. तब वे आज की तरह कांग्रेस में नहीं, नेशनल कांफ्रेंस के तीन में से एक सांसद होते थे...उन्हें हुमायूं रोड पर घर मिला था, जिसमें वे रहा करते थे..उन दिनों उनकी हालत खास अच्छी नहीं थी..वह दौर कश्मीर में आतंकवाद के तेजी से पैर पसारने का था..लिहाजा कश्मीर पर लिखने वालों की मांग बढ़ गई थी.. सैफुद्दीन सोज चूंकि कश्मीरी हैं, लिहाजा उन्हें भी लिखने का चस्का लग गया था...लेखन के जरिए वे कुछ पैसे भी कमाना चाहते थे..इसलिए उन्होंने कृष्ण किशोर पांडेय से मुलाकात की थी..तब फ्रीलांसरों में के के पांडेय के तौर पर मशहूर पांडेय जी ने उनके पास जाने और उनसे उनके लेख लाने की जिम्मेदारी मुझे दी थी.. तब इंटरनेट नहीं था..लिहाजा वे अपने सहयोगी से अंग्रेजी में टाइप किया हुआ लेख तैयार रखते और मेेरे पीपी नंबर पर मैसेज दे देते। मैं इस उत्साह में जाकर उनके लेख ले आता, क्योंकि उसके अनुवाद की भी जिम्मेदारी मेरी होती थी...जिसके एवज में कभी साढ़े तीन सौ तो कभी चार सौ रूपए बतौर मेहनताना मिलता था...जिससे उस फाकामस्ती के दौर में कुछ दिन के गुजारे के लिए सहूलियत हो जाती... मुझे कभी याद नहीं है कि सोज ने उन दिनों कभी भारत विरोधी बात की हो...उलटे वे भारतीयता की ही बात करते थे..कभी ठीक से बैठने को भी नहीं बोलते थे..लेकिन लेख निकलने में देर होती तो मैं ही निर्लज्जता से उनकी बैठक में बैठ जाता... उनके दिन बहुरे तब, जब देवेगौड़ा सरकार में वे जलसंसाधन मंत्री बने..बाद में जब नेशनल कांफ्रेंस एनडीए में शामिल हुई तो सोज ने नेशनल कांफ्रेंस छोड़ कांग्रेस का दामन थाम लिया....इसके बाद जब उनसे संसद परिसर में मुलाकात भी हुई तो वे अनचीन्ह होने की कोशिश करते थे... कश्मीर के नेताओं की दरअसल हकीकत यही रही है, जब तक उनकी हैसियत नहीं रहती, चाहे वह राजनीतिक हो या आर्थिक...तब तक वे भारत का गुण गाते नहीं थकते..उन्हें भारत में ही भविष्य नजर आता है.. लेकिन जैसे ही उनकी हैसियत बदलने लगती है, उनके सुर बदलने लगते हैं..सोज इसके अकेले उदाहरण नहीं हैं..कश्मीर को कूट-कूट कर खाने वाले फारूक़ अब्दुल्ला के बयान भी सोज के बयान से अलहदा नहीं हैं..बस तरीका अलग है.. ऐसे में सवाल जरूर उठता है कि आखिर क्या वजह है कि कश्मीरी नेताओं के ताकत में आते ही बयान बदल जाते हैं...इतने कि वे भारत विरोधी हो जाते हैं..क्या इसके पीछे कुछ और पाने की लालसा होती है...या फिर कहीं से कुछ और मिल जाता है...जरूरी है कि अब इस नजरिए से सोज जैसे नेताओं के बयानों की चीरफाड़ हो..अगर वे दोषी हों, तो उनके भी खिलाफ वैसी ही कार्रवाई हो, जैसे ऐसे बयान देने वाले किसी दूसरे गैर कश्मीरी भारतीय नागरिक के खिलाफ होती रही है...